DIPLOMACY IN A WHIRLPOOL |
DOCUMENT 9
ANNEX TO THE POTSDAM PROTOCOL 1
TEXT OF A LETTER TRANSMITTED ON JULY 12 TO THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE U. S.
AND U. K. GOVERNMENTS ON THE ALLIED CONTROL GOMMISSION IN HUNGARY.
In view of the changed situation in connection with the termination of the
war against Germany, the Soviet Government finds it necessary to establish the
following order of work for the Allied Control Commission in Hungary.
1. During the period up to the conclusion of peace with Hungary the President
(or Vice-President) of the ACC will regularly call conferences with the
British and American representatives for the purpose of discussing the most
important questions relating to the work of the ACC. The conferences will be
called once in 10 days, or more frequently in case of need.
Directives of the ACC on questions of principle will be issued to the
Hungarian authorities by the President of the Allied Control Commission after
agreement on these directives with the English and American representatives.
2. The British and American representatives in the ACC will take part in
general conferences of heads of divisions and delegates of the ACC, convoked by
the President of the ACC, which meetings will be regular in nature. The British
and American representatives will also participate personally or through their
representatives in appropriate instances in mixed commissions created by the
President of the ACC for questions connected with the execution by the ACC of
its functions.
3. Free movement by the American and British representatives in the country
will be permitted provided that the ACC is previously informed of the time and
route of the journeys.
4. All questions connected with permission for the entrance and exit of members
of the staff of the British and American representatives in Hungary will be
decided on the spot by the President of the ACC within a time limit of not more
than one week.
--------- 1 A Decade of American Foreign Policy, Basic Documents, l941-49
(Washington, 1950), pp. 47-48.
246
5. The bringing in and sending out by plane of mail, cargoes and diplomatic
couriers will be carried out by the British and American representatives on the
ACC under arrangements and within time limits established by the ACC, or in
special cases by previous coordination with the President of the ACC.
I consider it necessary to add to the above that in all other points the
existing Statutes regarding the ACC in Hungary, which was confirmed on January
20, 1945, shall remain in force in the future.
DOCUMENT 1O
NOTE OF THE HUNGARIAN GOVERNMENT TO THE BRITISH, SOVIET AND UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENTS CONCERNING THE EXPULSION OF THE GERMANS FROM HUNGARY.
Hungarian Ministry for Foreign Affairs 1 301/res. Be. 1945
Sir,
Certain news items published in the Press indicate that those competent to
settle the problems of Central-Europe are misinformed about the number of
Germans in Hungary and, what is more, about the number of Germans who may be
expatriated from Hungary under the principles adopted by the victorious Great
Powers. For this reason the Hungarian Government consider it as their
obligation to inform His Britannic Majesty's Government about the following:
Census figures of 1941 indicate that the number of people of German vernacular
on the territory of Hungary amounted to 477,057, while those of German
nationality amounted to 303,419.
The difference between the two figures is considerable and due to the fact
that amongst those of German vernacular were numerous elements of Jewish or
non-German descents; moreover many of German descent and German vernacular
entered their name on the census sheets as being of Hungarian nationality.
This latter attitude meant their definitive rupture with Germanism and open
confession on the side of Hungary in 1941, the heyday of German victories, just
in the period of increasing German pressure and terror. Indeed, there is a
considerable number of people of German descent and German vernacular who were
willing to share the fate of Hungarians even in the period of the severest
German oppression, many of them having participated also in the resistance
movement of the democratic parties. And, indeed, while the special procedure
undertaken in order to investigate the political reliability of Germans was
under way, it was proven that in most cases only those can be penalized who
gave confession of their being of German nationality.
Investigation of the German population as to their national loyalty takes
place by means of district committees formed especially for that purpose under
decree no. 3820/1945. M.E.
These district committees, after having taken into consideration the local
conditions, and after a thorough and scrupulous pondering of all available data
relating to the general attitude and individual status of persons under
investigation, may ascertain the following facts:
1. They may ascertain that the person under investigation played a leading
part in some Hitlerite organization, or by his own will joined an SS formation
(par. 1., art. 4.).
2. They may ascertain that the person under investigation was a simple member
247
DlPLOMACY IN A WHIRLPOOL
of a Hitlerite organization (par. 2., art. 3.).
3. They may ascertain that the person under investigation, although not being
a member of any Hitlerite organization, still supported its aims (par. 3., art.
4.).
4. They may ascertain that the person under investigation was neither a
leader, nor a member or supporter of any Hitlerite organization (par. 4., art.
4.).
Besides that, they may establish under art. 6 of the decree that certain
persons of German nationality gave testimony of their patriotism and democratic
spirit in spite of Hitlerite terror.
30,000 out of the total 303,000 persons of German nationality are living in
towns, so that the investigation undertaken by the district committees affects
273.000 persons living in villages. Investigation returns from 96 communities
indicate that 10% of the village population of German nationality were
Volksbund leaders or SS soldiers, 28% members of the Volksbund or the Hitler
Jugend, 32% supporters of the Volksbund, and 30% had no connection whatsoever
with the Volksbund. Estimates in accordance with these data make it probable
that 38% of the Swabian nationality, that is 103,000 persons, are to be
punished by confiscation of their property under decree no. 3820/1945. M. E. As
it is well known, this number comprises the members and leaders of Hitlerite
organizations. Even adding to this figure the Germans having supported the
Volksbund, the number of Germans to be expatriated will hardly exceed 200,000.
Considering the fact that the most compromised Germans, and especially a
considerable part of the German male population, left the territory of the
country together with the beaten German army, it seems to be probable that
200,000 to 250,000 will prove to be a realistic estimate of the German
population to be expatriated, as it has been intimated in the note of the 26th
May, 1945 addressed by the Hungarian Government to the Government of the
Soviet Union.
The Government of democratic Hungary avail themselves of this opportunity to
state that it would be contrary to their conviction that Hungarian citizens
should be expatriated solely on account of their ethnic origin. They are averse
to this as well as to any kind of collective punishment. For this reason they
consider it desirable that only those Germans should be expatriated who were
manifest traitors to the cause of Hungary by their attitude of having served
Hitlerism. The expatriation of these people is, however, considered to be
absolutely necessary by the Hungarian Government, and they have the honour to
request it, since this would be one of the pledges that German spirit and
German oppression shall never be able to dominate this country again.
I avail myself of this opportunity to express to You, Sir, the assurance of
my high consideration.
Budapest, December 1st, 1945. (signed) Gyongyosi.1
--------- 1 Identical notes were sent to the United States and Soviet Political
Representatives.
DOCUMENT 11
NOTE VERBALE OF THE HUNGARIAN FOREIGN MINISTRY TO THE BRITISH AND UNITED
STATES POLITICAL MISSIONS IN BUDAPEST CONCERNING THE EXPULSION OF THE GERMANS
FROM HUNGARY.
139/res.Be. Budapest, December 15th, 1945. 1945.
N o t e V e r b a l e.
The Hungarian Government present their compliments to His Britannic Majesty's
Government and have the honour to communicate the following:
248
According to the point of view expressed repeatedly by the Hungarian
Government up to the present, only those Germans were to be transferred to
Germany who had joined the Volksbund or the SS, or who committed in the course
of the war, an act of disloyalty against Hungary. The Government never
planned, however. a transfer based on the mere fact of German origin, or
speaking German as the mother tongue, which would mean a removal equalling
collective punishment.
Considering, however, that from certain news items published in the press one
could draw the conclusion that the Allied Powers are planning to oblige
Hungary to remove 500,000 Germans, the Hungarian Government have the honour to
request the kind communication of His Britannic Majesty's Goverment's ultimate
position concerning this question.
Note No 130/res/Be of the Hungarian Ministry for Foreign Affairs dated
December 1st 1945, contains detailed particulars regarding the number of
Germans in Hungary. L.S. 1 ---------1. An identical note was sent to
the American Political Mission in Budapest.
DOCUMENT 12 MEMORANDUM OF THE UNITED STATES MISSION IN BUDAPEST CONCERNING
THE TRANSFER OF NATIONAL MINORITIES IN CZECHOSLOVAKIA. 1
In a note to the Government of that Republic in January of the current year
the preliminary views held by the Government of the United States regarding the
expulsion of Germans from the Czechoslovak Republic were expressed along the
following lines:
1. Not only the needs of Czechoslovakia but also considerations of a general
nature affecting future European peace and security, especially including the
problems with which the occupation authorities of the Allies are faced in
Germany, must be taken into account in solving this problem.
2. Minorities should only be transferred under the principles of international
justice and in pursuance of international arrangements appropriate to that
end.
3. In order to facilitate the settlement of transferred persons in an orderly
way, they should be transferred by gradual processes.
4. No one nation should take action to effect the transfer of large groups of
human beings pending the conclusion of international arrangements as above
advocated.
The principles set forth in the note above mentioned to the Government of the
Czechoslovak Republic are considered by the United States as being no less
applicable with regard to the expulsion of minorities of Hungarian-speaking
people from Rumania or Yugoslavia as well as Czechoslovakia.
The Governments of those states are primarily concerned with the matter of
responsibility of these Hungarians for crimes against the state of which such
Hungarians are citizens. The United States, however, would not consider it
justified to deal with all members of an ethnic group who constitute a minority
as criminals against the state and as subject to expulsion from its territory,
only because of their ethnic origin.
It will be recalled that in the matter of the proposed organization of an
international military court which will try major war criminals in Europe,
the
--------- 1 Hungary and the Conference of Paris, Vol. II, pp. 4-5.
249
Government of the United States proposed that a procedure be adopted which
would make certain both a speedy and a just trial of important individuals and
organizations who stand accused of war crimes and atrocities in European
countries. The Government of the United States is not disposed to consider as
included among such organizations entire minority groups of a single racial
origin. On May 21, 1945, the Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Czechoslovak
Republic who was then at San Francisco, California, said that punishment would
be imposed only upon Hungarians who had conspired against the Czechoslovak
Republic and who had fought on the side of the Nazis, but that those
Hungarians who had shown friendliness to the cause of Czechoslovakia might
remain in that country with the full rights of citizens of that Republic.
It may be added, that when reference is made in the foregoing to the Hungarian
minorities it is not intended to include recent immigrants and displaced
persons but only permanent residents of the countries mentioned belonging to
the Hungarian-speaking group.
Budapest, June 12th, 1945.
DOCUMENT 13
REPLY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TO VARIOUS HUNGARIAN PROPOSALS
CONCERNING THE PROBLEMS OF THE HUNGARIANS IN CZECHOSLOVAKIA. 1 Legation of
the United States Budapest, Hungary, February 9, 1946 of America.
Mr. Minister,
I have the honor to refer to Your Excellency's Notes No. 120/res.-Be. of
November 20, 1945 and No. 133/res.-Be., of December 11, 1945, in the matter of
the Hungarian-Czechoslovak minority question and to inform Your Excellency, by
instruction of my Government, in reply to those Notes as follows:
1. In present circumstances the Government of the United States does not
consider feasible the formation of an international commission to examine the
Hungarian-Czechoslovak minority problem or to supervise any exchange of
population.
2. The Government of the United States cannot support a request for the
establishment of international control of the districts inhabited by Hungarians
in Slovakia.
3. The Government of the United States will recognize and support a humane
settlement freely agreed to between the Governments of Hungary and the
Czechoslovak Republic.
I take this opportunity to renew to Your Excellency the assurance of my
highest consideration.
(Signed) H. F. Arthur Schoenfeld.
His Excellency M. Janos Gyongyosi, Minister for Foreign Affairs.
--------- 1 Hungary and the Conference of Paris, Vol. II, pp. 53-54.
DOCUMENT 14
REPLY OF THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT TO THE VARIOUS HUNGARIAN PROPOSALS CONCERNING
THE PROBLEMS OF THE HUNGARIANS IN CZECHOSLOVAKlA 1
British Political Mission in Hungary. Budapest, March 19, 1946. No. 45
(4/73/46).
Your Excellency,
250
I have the honour to refer to your communications No. 61/res.-Be. dated 14
September, No. 120/res.-Be. dated 20 November and No. 133/res.-Be. dated 11
December, 1945, regarding the Magyar minorities in Slovakia in which Your
Excellency put forward a proposal that an international commission should be
appointed to investigate the problems under dispute between the Hungarian and
Czechoslovakian Governments and that, pending the appointment of such a
Commission, the districts of Slovakia inhabited by Hungarians should be placed
under international control. In the above communications it was also suggested
that should exchanges of population be impossible, the transfer of Hungarians
from Czechoslovakia to Hungary should be effected by the cession of the
Czechoslovak territory in which the Hungarian minority resides.
2. The views expressed by Your Excellency on behalf of the Hungarian
Government have been carefully considered by His Majesty's Government and I
now have the honour, by direction from His Majesty's Principal Secretary of
State for Foreign Affairs, to inform you that His Majesty's Government would
be unwilling to participate in any international commission for the examination
of the problem of Hungarian minorities in Czechoslovakia or for the supervision
of any Czechoslovak-Hungarian exchange of population on the lines proprosed by
the Hungarian Government. His Majesty's Government are of the opinion that
this question should be settled on a bilateral basis between the two
Governments concerned. Further, they would not be prepared to try to persuade
the Czechoslovakian Government to agree to any frontier rectification in
favour of Hungary though they would not withhold recognition of any changes
freely agreed to between the two countries concerned.
3. His Majesty's Government have taken note of the agreement recently
negotiated in Prague for the exchange of population and I am instructed to
inform Your Excellency that this development confirms His Majesty's Government
in their view that the best method of making progress in this problem is by
direct negotiation between the two interested parties.
I have the honour to avail myself of this opportunity to renew to Your
Excellency the assurance of my high consideration.
(Signed) W. Mitchel Carse
Acting British Political Representative
His Excellency Gyongyosi,
Hungarian Minister for Foreign Affairs.
--------- 1 Hungary and the Conference of Paris, Vol. II, pp. 54-55.
DOCUMENT 15
THE SPIRIT OF HUNGARY. 1
LEADERS' EFFORTS TO ESTABLISH DEMOCRATIC STATE.
A REAL IF UNEASY COALITION.
Any British visitor's estimate of the present state of Hungary must depend on
the direction from which he arrives in the country. If he comes straight from
London to Budapest he will be depressed by the war damage, the economic
hardships, and the general uncertainty. But if (like your Correspondent) he
comes from Rumania he will have just the contrary impression. He will note the
energy with which the people of Budapest are rebuilding their city. He can buy
newspapers and periodicals expressing widely different opinions on
controversial subjects. Above all he will be surprised by the vigorous
intellectual
---------1 Excerpts from an article published in London Times, October 31,
1946.
251
activity displayed both in print and in conversation. In comparison with the
mental sterility and haunting fear prevalent in the Balkans, Hungary seems an
oasis of culture and liberty.
This comparison is essential for an understanding of the Danubian situation as
a whole. It should not, however, be taken to mean that Hungary has not her
troubles. In fact she is faced with grave problems in internal politics, in
economic life, and in foreign policy.
The Hungarian Government is a coalition, and, unlike Rumania and Bulgaria, a
real coalition. ...
It cannot be said that the coalition is working smoothly. There is constant
friction in big and small matters. ... The Communists and Small Farmers
exchange accusations and insults in public. It is frequently said that "this
cannot last" and yet somehow it has lasted, and may well last a long time yet.
Neither the left block nor the Small Farmers are confident of their ability to
rule alone. Reconstruction needs the united efforts of all. In the last resort
almost every one prefers the present situation to a breach.
... The parties of the left, though feared by many Hungarians as aggressors,
consider themselves on the defensive. ...
In contrast to Rumania and the Southern Slav countries, it can be said of
Hungary that, in spite of difficulties and mistakes, a real attempt is being
made to build a democracy capable of maintaining friendship with both the
Soviet Union and the Anglo-Saxon Powers. Whether it will succeed will depend,
at least in part, on the west.